A New Morality from Science. Beyondism by Arnold P. Goldstein (Eds.)

By Arnold P. Goldstein (Eds.)

Show description

Read Online or Download A New Morality from Science. Beyondism PDF

Similar ethics & morality books

Moral Perception and Particularity

So much modern ethical philosophy is worried with problems with rationality, universality, impartiality, and precept. against this Lawrence Blum is anxious with the psychology of ethical organisation. The essays during this assortment learn the ethical import of emotion, motivation, judgment, belief, and staff identifications, and discover how a lot of these psychic capacities give a contribution to a morally reliable lifestyles.

Moral Principles and Social Values

An advent to ethical philosophy masking such subject matters as ethical clash, morality and the legislation, emotivism and prescriptivism, the morality of politics, and useful cause.

Weighing Lives

We're frequently confronted with offerings that contain the weighing of people's lives opposed to one another, or the weighing of lives opposed to different great things. those are offerings either for people and for societies. we need to make a choice from the ease to ourselves of street and air trip, and the lives of the longer term those that can be killed via the worldwide warming we reason.

Additional resources for A New Morality from Science. Beyondism

Sample text

A s pointed out above although the sinister, significant rise in criminal, anti-social action throughout most "civilized" countries over the last twenty years; or the increasing alienation and identity crises of youth; or the emotionality cult against logical analysis (Hofstadter, 1963); or the rising suicide and drug addiction, have associations with (a) economic causes, notably an increasing real standard of living (leisure and lack of hunger promote experiment), yet the most highly correlated association is (b) the appearance of "moral relativism" or the decay of agreed ethical authority.

The actual supremacy of biological goals is patent in the individual's use of rationalization and doubtful reasoning in trying to save his own life and interests. But it needs to be recognized in a broader, more dignified and ethical sense, namely, in appreciating the proper role of reason in defining general human goals. Alas, in a more specific sense and through what psychoanalysis has recognized as the defense mechanisms, including rationalization, reason is not even a servant of inborn needs, but an abject slave, ready to live if necessary by dishonesty.

The matter can perhaps be illustrated on a relatively trivial and therefore hopefully more detached level by what happened recently when a group of British and American social scientists got together on an economic issue. , they both alike (a) began by failing to make any statement on, and therefore to draw any clear line between their scientific and their moral value premises; (b) assumed such Christian values as that town planning would not include a brothel, and (c) assumed predominantly democratic rather than, say, Communist or Fascist ethical and political values, though without being able to define what they understood by these.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.82 of 5 – based on 14 votes